Comments on: Evolution of Mankind! http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/ Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:55:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: reak http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/comment-page-1/#comment-11374 reak Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:12:48 +0000 http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/#comment-11374 true...but i won't say it discrimination though... true…but i won’t say it discrimination though…

]]> By: Panha http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/comment-page-1/#comment-11348 Panha Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:58:57 +0000 http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/#comment-11348 Yeah, in Cambodia it's the opposite. To think about it, males are quite discriminated against there... We have this saying "slab ba kom oy te slab meh, lich tuk kandal tonle kom oy teh pleung ches phteas" right? Yeah, in Cambodia it’s the opposite. To think about it, males are quite discriminated against there… We have this saying “slab ba kom oy te slab meh, lich tuk kandal tonle kom oy teh pleung ches phteas” right?

]]> By: reak http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/comment-page-1/#comment-11344 reak Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:56:42 +0000 http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/#comment-11344 haha....that's ridiculous. In Cambodia history, however it's quiet the opposite...we're all aware that most things big, great, grand...are all "meh" which refers to feminine. So i think there're equally his era and her era....enjoy it while it lasts! keke haha….that’s ridiculous. In Cambodia history, however it’s quiet the opposite…we’re all aware that most things big, great, grand…are all “meh” which refers to feminine. So i think there’re equally his era and her era….enjoy it while it lasts! keke

]]> By: Panha http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/comment-page-1/#comment-11334 Panha Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:23:30 +0000 http://www.vireak.net/2007/07/10/evolution-of-mankind/#comment-11334 If the Bible were right, then women evolved from men's ribs. God created Eve from Adam's rib (which sounds ridiculous to me). Hence, we have: " Women evolved from apes' ribs! Women are created by God from men's ribs! Women evolved from [insert whatever here]'s ribs..." Obviously, it's quite unfair for the ladies that our world is a predominantly masculine one. Otherwise, why would we call history "history"? Why don't we call it "herstory"? If the Bible were right, then women evolved from men’s ribs. God created Eve from Adam’s rib (which sounds ridiculous to me). Hence, we have:

” Women evolved from apes’ ribs!
Women are created by God from men’s ribs!
Women evolved from [insert whatever here]‘s ribs…”

Obviously, it’s quite unfair for the ladies that our world is a predominantly masculine one. Otherwise, why would we call history “history”? Why don’t we call it “herstory”?

]]>